Pages

Thursday, February 28, 2019

After slow start, tax refunds are ticking up, with the average check now more than $3,000

Close to a month into tax season, tax refunds are starting to increase.

The average check is now $3,143 for the week ending Feb. 22, according to the IRS. That's just about on par with last year's figures, reflecting a rise of 1.3 percent year over year.

The increase in refund amounts is a change from the recent downward trend of smaller checks.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in an interview with CNBC on Thursday that refunds were rising. "Tax refunds are up 17 percent week over week," he said. That basically gets us to the same level as last year."

More from Smart Tax Planning:
What taxpayers should know about the new Form 1040
Use your tax return to unearth your spouse's money secrets
Why the average tax refund is down 16 percent

This tax season is particularly notable for filers.

It's the first time taxpayers are submitting their returns under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which took effect last year.

Taxpayers have been grappling with the overhaul, which nearly doubled the standard deduction, eliminated personal exemptions and placed limits on itemized deductions.

Since the opening of filing season on January 28 and up until the week ending February 15, the average refund was down compared to last year.

Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas), who had sponsored the tax overhaul as it made its way through Congress, had told CNBC that those refunds were smaller for 2018 because taxpayers received their money in their paychecks during the year.

He said filers can retool their tax withholding at work using Form W-4.

If you withhold too much, you're likely to get a refund.

However, if you withhold less, you'll see more cash in your paycheck in the immediate term. But the following year, your refund will be smaller — or you may owe if you withheld too little.

"The people who are most likely to be surprised this year are the ones who lost some deductions they had last year and who didn't make changes to their withholding," said Nathan Rigney, lead tax research analyst at the Tax Institute at H&R Block.

In 2018, the Treasury Department and the IRS updated the withholding tables to reflect the new law.

Major changes include the end of personal exemptions, the doubling of the standard deduction and reduced individual income tax rates.

These withholding tables are guidelines that your employer follows in order to deduct the right amount of income tax from your paycheck.

The tables are intended to work alongside Form W-4, which you can use to tailor your taxes based on whether your spouse works, whether you have children and other factors.

The tax agency has been reminding taxpayers throughout 2018 to take a second look at their withholding and make estimated payments, if needed.

Even retirees were encouraged to ensure they were withholding sufficient tax from pension and Social Security payments.

Last month, the IRS announced it would waive the estimated tax penalty for filers who paid at least 85 percent of what they owed during 2018.

Normally, you have to pay at least 90 percent of your tax liability in order to avoid the penalty.

If you owe this season, consider it a lesson learned and do what you can to head off the same troubles in 2019.

It's generally a good practice to review your withholding, especially if you've been through major life changes, including getting married or having children.

If you're unhappy with your 2018 results, talk to your tax preparer or accountant about running a projection of your 2019 taxes.

Also, don't get too tied up fretting over the size of your refund as a chief determinant of how you fared this tax season.

Instead, look at your tax liability last year versus this year and see how they stand against your income, said Chris Benson, CPA and principal at L.K. Benson & Co. in Towson, Maryland.

"You want to compare the tax liability to your income," he said. "Everyone wants to know, 'Did I save money or not with the new tax bill,' and the best way to check is to look at liability versus income."

Let's block ads! (Why?)

from Top News & Analysis https://ift.tt/2EkHyw9
via IFTTT

Trump allies Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows accuse Michael Cohen of lying during bombshell hearing

Two of President Donald Trump's biggest allies in Congress on Thursday told the Justice Department that Michael Cohen appears to have lied in his sworn testimony to Congress, where he made a slew of damning claims against Trump.

House Oversight Committee ranking member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr accusing Trump's former personal lawyer and fixer of making a series of "intentionally false statements designed to make himself look better on a national stage."

Read the letter to the attorney general here.

"Mr. Cohen's testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Reform," they wrote, "was a spectacular and brazen attempt to knowing [sic] and willfully testify falsely and fictitiously to numerous material facts."

The two Republicans want the Justice Department to investigate whether Cohen's allegedly false testimony broke the law.

Cohen, 52, appeared before three congressional committees this week, having already pleaded guilty last year to tax evasion and campaign-finance violations, as well as lying to Congress in prior testimony in 2017. He is scheduled to report to prison in May for a three-year sentence.

Cohen's spokesman Lanny Davis responded to the accusations in a statement to CNBC:

Mr. Cohen testified truthfully before the House Oversight Committee. He took full responsibility for his guilty pleas. He also backed up much of his testimony with documents. It may not be surprising that two pro-Trump Committee members known have a baseless criminal referral. In my opinion, it is a sad misuse of the criminal justice system with the aura of pure partisanship.

Jordan and Meadows suggest Cohen lied about:

  • The crimes that he has already pleaded guilty to — specifically, when he testified, "I never defrauded any bank." The lawmakers cite Cohen's plea agreement with federal prosecutors in New York, which describes one of his crimes as "bank fraud."
  • Whether or not he sought a White House job after Trump was elected president in 2016. Here, Jordan and Meadows point to court filings from federal prosecutors, saying that text messages seized from Cohen say that he "expected to be given a prominent role and title in the new administration." They also cite multiple tweets from Trump-friendly figures, including former detective Bo Dietl and former Trump campaign aide and pastor Darrell Scott.
  • Whether he directed the "commission" of the "Women for Cohen" Twitter account that was created during the 2016 presidential campaign.
  • Having no "reportable contracts with foreign government entities," as he submitted in a form to the committee before his public hearing.
  • Being a "good lawyer who understood the need to present his client with sound legal advice." Jordan and Meadows claim this contradicts a written statement from Cohen.
  • Whether Trump directed him and Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Wiesselberg to "go back to his office and figure out how to [make the $130,000 payment to Ms. Clifford."
  • Committing crimes out of "blind loyalty" to Trump.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

from Top News & Analysis https://ift.tt/2UeqqPo
via IFTTT